Difference Between Naprapathy and Chiropractic
Naprapathy occurred at the beginning of the 1900s in the United States.
It would be wise to say that to say that chiropractic and Naprapathy comes from the same tree, but has developed into either a branch. Common to the two disciplines is that the bulk of the processing takes place nowhere but your hands. Diagnostics and treatment going on in this way is called manual medicine. The change in processing occurs when the nervous system gets a new “input” so that the old patterns that caused the discomfort can be normalized. Both the physiotherapist and chiropractor are competent to perform the so-called “joint adjustment” to normalize the movement.
Most people who engage in manual medicine have a broad training and experience to diagnose ailments from muscular and skeletal system, such as pain in the neck, shoulders, headaches, lower back, hips, knees, etc. Many have also acquired skills that can alleviate other conditions normally forknippes with manual medicine, such as ADHD, gastrointestinal problems, asthma, etc. Manual medicine and conventional medicine is however complementary to one another, and if the problem does not come from normal disturbances in the musculoskeletal system, the patient should be referred to a doctor.
Naprapathy is a cross between chiropractic and physical therapy
Naprapathy is a profession, and it would be wrong to say that there is something between anything. Behind the simplification is often an understanding that a physiotherapist working with both muscles and joints, while the chiropractor works only with the part. Many people see it this way. The simplification works if the argument is that both the muscles and joints get examination and treatment.
By working within the manual medicine, we know a lot about other professions that come from the same “trunk”. We do know best what we can and stand for. There are good therapists in all “branches” in manual medicine (naprapathy, chiropractic, manual therapy, physiotherapy, osteopathy, etc.).